Sign in to share
Shikha Sharma
My husband and I have been fighting about the bedroom temperature for six years.
Not fighting in the serious sense. Fighting in the way that couples fight about things that will never be resolved and both people know will never be resolved and continue to fight about anyway because the alternative is accepting that this is simply how things are and neither of us is fully ready to accept that.
The situation is this. I am cold. He is hot. Not sometimes. Always. Regardless of the actual temperature outside, regardless of the season, regardless of what the weather app says, I am cold and he is hot. We share a bedroom. The bedroom has one AC. The AC has one remote.
The remote is the most contested object in our home.
In summer, the fight is about how cold to keep the room. He wants it cold enough to sleep comfortably. I want it cold enough that I am not sweating but warm enough that I do not need to be covered in a blanket from head to toe to survive the night. These are different temperatures. The AC cannot be both temperatures simultaneously. This is a fundamental physical constraint that we have spent six years trying to negotiate around.
In winter, the fight is about whether the AC needs to be on at all. He says yes, airflow is necessary for good sleep, the fan mode is fine. I say the fan mode at night in December is a form of mild cruelty and I would like to be warm and the blanket is not sufficient and could he please not direct the airflow at my side of the bed.
He says he is not directing it. The airflow goes where it goes. I say it goes toward me. He says I am closer to the vent. I say this was not something I agreed to when we arranged the furniture.
Last winter I bought a heated blanket. It was the best purchase I have made in six years of marriage. I am warm. He has airflow. The temperature war entered a new phase of managed coexistence rather than active conflict. We put Sunfeast Marie Light on the bedside table to celebrate, which is not something we normally do but felt appropriate for the occasion. We ate biscuits in bed. The AC was on fan mode. I was warm. It was genuinely a good evening.
The heated blanket did not end the war. It created a new front. The new front is about whether the AC should be on fan mode all night or whether it can be turned off after a certain hour when the temperature has dropped enough that airflow is no longer necessary. This is now the active dispute.
The Blanket Situation
Before the heated blanket there was the blanket situation.
We have a duvet. The duvet is the right weight for him and not quite the right weight for me, which means I need additional coverage that he does not need, which means I have a supplementary blanket on my side.
The supplementary blanket has created a duvet distribution problem. I take more of the duvet than I need because I am cold and taking more duvet provides the psychological comfort of coverage even when the supplementary blanket is doing the actual thermal work. He has less duvet than he would prefer. He does not complain about this directly. He has mentioned it once, in a context that made clear it was not the first time he had thought about it.
I have heard the mention. I have not changed my duvet behaviour because changing it would require me to be less warm and I am not willing to be less warm.
My friend Priya has the exact same arrangement with her husband except reversed. She is the hot one. He is the cold one. She finds this remarkable. She says she always assumed she would marry someone with compatible temperature preferences. The universe had other ideas. She now sleeps with a thin sheet while he sleeps under what she describes as an unconscionable amount of insulation.
She has accepted this. He has accepted this. They have both accepted it the way you accept a thing that is not going to change, which is with a certain peace that is different from enthusiasm but is its own valid relationship with an unchanging fact.
The Science We Have Each Consulted
We have both, independently, looked up information about optimal sleeping temperatures and used the findings to support our existing positions.
My husband found an article that said cooler temperatures improve sleep quality and cited this to me as evidence that his preference was not just personal comfort but health-optimised behaviour. I found an article that said individual temperature preferences vary significantly and that forcing someone to sleep in discomfort disrupts their sleep quality and cited this as evidence that my preference was not just personal comfort but also health-optimised behaviour.
We both had science. The science was contradictory. Neither of us updated our position.
My friend Kabir did the same thing with his wife. He found research. She found different research. The research was inconclusive in the way research about personal preference is usually inconclusive. They now have a household where both of them believe they have scientific support for their position and the temperature remains unchanged.
This is not how science is supposed to work. This is how marriage works.
The Hotel Discovery
The most interesting data point in the temperature war came from a hotel stay.
We were travelling and staying in a hotel and the hotel room had a thermostat that could be set to a precise temperature rather than a relative AC setting. My husband set it to his preferred temperature. I said it was too cold. We negotiated. We landed on a temperature.
We both slept well.
I want to be careful about what I conclude from this. I think what happened is that having a precise number to negotiate around was more tractable than negotiating around relative cold settings which we experience differently and cannot objectively compare. Twenty-three degrees is twenty-three degrees. My cold is not the same as his cold. Twenty-three degrees gave us a shared reference point.
We came home and bought a smart AC unit with precise temperature control.
The war has not ended. But it has become more quantified. We are now fighting about specific numbers rather than vague thermal experiences. This is progress.
The Part That Is Actually Fine
Six years into this, I have a certain fondness for the temperature war.
It is one of the most consistent things in our relationship. It has not changed. It will not change. I will always be cold. He will always be hot. We will always have a version of this conversation. It is, in its way, a fixed point.
There are relationships where nothing is contested, where both people want the same things and like the same temperatures and never have to negotiate anything. I think this sounds both pleasant and slightly boring. Our bedroom temperature situation has produced more creative problem-solving than almost anything else in our marriage. The supplementary blanket. The heated blanket. The smart AC. The hotel thermostat revelation. We have been innovating for six years.
I am still cold. He is still hot. The AC remote is still contested.
We will figure it out tonight the same way we figure it out every night, which is by one person setting a temperature and the other person adjusting it and the first person adjusting it back and eventually arriving at something both of us can tolerate.
It takes about ten minutes.
Then we go to sleep.
