Sign in to share
Shikha Sharma
I know where my husband is right now.
His location is shared with mine on Google Maps and has been for three years. I can see it at any time on my phone, and it is currently showing him at a place I recognise as being on his way home from a meeting he told me about this morning. He is about twenty minutes out. I have not texted him to ask when he is getting home. I already know.
He knows where I am too. My location is shared with him. I am at home. This is information he has access to without asking, without a check-in, without any active exchange between us. Both facts are available to both of us, continuously, in real time.
I did not expect this to feel like anything.
It feels like something.
I noticed it properly about a year into having shared location. I was at a work event that was running long, the kind where you cannot check your phone easily and the end time is unclear, and I was aware at some level that my husband knew where I was. Not from a text. Not from a call. Just from the map. He could see I was at the venue. He knew I was fine. He did not need to send a where are you message because the where was already answered.
I came home and he said the event ran long, the map showed you were there until quite late. He said it not as a question or a comment about the lateness. Just as an observation. He had seen. He had been quietly aware of where I was for four hours without either of us having to do anything about it.
I sat down and we had chai and Sunfeast Marie Light and I thought about what it meant that this person had been background-aware of me all evening, the way you are background-aware of someone in the same house. You cannot see them but you know they are there, and the knowing changes the quality of the space.
How It Started
We turned on shared location in 2021 during a period when I was travelling for work more than usual and the where are you are you safe back-and-forth on every trip was becoming its own thing.
The shared location removed the back-and-forth. The concern did not go away. The concern now had an answer that did not require a message. He could see I had landed. He could see I had reached the hotel. He could see I was at the conference venue and therefore fine in the way that being at a conference venue at 10am means fine.
The operational case was clear. That was why we turned it on.
What it turned out to do beyond that was not what we had anticipated.
What It Actually Does
My friend Priya and her husband turned on shared location and she said the thing it changed most was the end of day. He works late sometimes. Previously she would sit at home not knowing when to expect him, calculating from the most recent message, sometimes texting to ask, sometimes deciding not to ask because she did not want to seem like she was tracking him.
Now she can see he has left the office. She can see he is twenty minutes away. She can time the dinner without asking.
She said it removed a specific low-grade anxiety she had not fully registered until it was gone. The not-knowing that sits beneath the surface of an ordinary evening. She knows now. The knowing is quiet and constant and she does not think about it most of the time but it is there, doing its work.
The Sending of the Location
Beyond the passive sharing, there is the active sending of location.
I send my husband my live location when I am somewhere unfamiliar or when I am out late. He does not ask for it. I send it because he would want to know and the sending is the easiest way to communicate it without a full conversation.
He sends me his live location when he is driving in conditions that make him want me to know his route. Not every drive. Specific ones. Night drives. Long ones. The ones where having someone know your path feels less dramatic than superstitious and slightly more than unnecessary.
The sending says: I want you to know where I am. It is a small act of trust that costs almost nothing and means more than its size suggests.
What My Mother Does With This Information
My mother also has my location.
This was a separate decision and it operates differently. My mother's relationship with my location is active. She checks it. She notices things. She once called me because my location showed me stationary in an unfamiliar area for longer than she thought was necessary and she wanted to make sure I was fine.
I was fine. I was parked waiting for someone. But she had noticed and she had called and the call was the location being put to a different use than I had intended.
My husband's use of my location is passive and reassuring. My mother's use of my location is active and concerned. Both of them love me. The same information, accessed differently.
The map is neutral. The love that looks at the map is not.
The Thing It Says
Shared location is not primarily a safety feature or an operational convenience, though it is both of those things.
It is a form of saying I want to know where you are. Not to track you. Not to monitor you. But because knowing where you are is a version of being connected to you. Because in the ordinary separation of a day, when you are at your thing and I am at my thing and hours pass without contact, the map is a way of still having you in my peripheral vision.
You are twenty minutes away. You are at the office. You are on your way home.
These are small facts. The smallness of them is the point. Love in a long relationship is often very small. A location dot moving across a map. The knowledge that someone is on their way.
He is almost home.
